Natural
Metal Finish Paint Systems Test
by Mike McLeod
|
|
TEST PURPOSE
To evaluate the compatibility, suitability,
use characteristics, and resulting fidelity of "natural metal
finish (NMF)" replication for combinations of selected, readily
available commonly used silver paint and paint systems (otherwise
known as "metalizers") when applied over various types of base/primer
coats and/or covered with various clear type paint sealer/top
coat finishes.
TEST SCOPE
The scope of this test was limited
to those types of paint, which can be reasonably referred to
as metalizers, in that they attempt to or are suitable for,
replicating the look of bare, unmodified metals. While some
non-metalizer type paints were used in base coat and priming,
the major focus is on how well the applied silver "metalizer"
paint performed. Likewise, various clear finishes were applied
over metalizers to determine the characteristics and stability
of the over-coated metalizer finish. ALCLAD II type metalizers
were tested for compatibility and suitability with various base
primers then subjected to testing for ability to withstand aggressive
masking tape application and removal. A test was also performed
to evaluate characteristics of polyvinylacetate (PVA) for use
in masking on bare (not dipped in Future floor wax) plastic.
LIMITATIONS TO SCOPE OF TESTING
While the overall number of combinations
and permutations achieved during this test is significant, only
a small sample of all the commercially available metalizer products
was used. With many different metalizer shades and tones currently
in production, only four types of ALCLAD II, five types of enamel,
and six types of lacquer were tested. No clear coats were applied
to any of the ALCLAD II samples during this test. Some paint
systems specify a type of clear coat or sealer and a select
few were used in the test matrix per the manufacturer recommendations.
The general finish of the samples is of lower quality than would
be expected on a model due to the excessive handling and repeated
masking required to airbrush the rows and columns of paint on
each test card. Some unforeseen pitting of the plastic test
cards occurred during spraying on card number three for an undetermined
reason. This pitting degraded the surface smoothness a bit and
the underlying plastic substrate remains slightly soft to this
day. This pitting problem was limited primarily to three specific
enamel paints and did not adversely affect results. Being a
somewhat relative term, when discussing the group of silver
paints used in this test, the context of "color" refers to the
relative darkness and variable-shaded tone the paint tends to
show. Referring to reflectance, brilliance, or shine is an indication
of the final product's ability to act like a mirror. "Wetness"
refers to the final surface look, not related to color or reflectance,
as if the surface appears to have a layer of shiny viscous fluid
covering it.
MATERIALS
With a host of various paints available,
a system of abbreviations was used to identify and categorize
the materials in used in this test. The following lists the
major abbreviations:
- MM Testors Model Masters
Enamel
- TS Testors "small square"
bottles, ¼ ounce each
- BF Testors Model Masters
buffing metalizer lacquers
- NB Testors Model Masters
Non-Buffing metalizer lacquers
- SNJ The SNJ spray and powder
system
- PS Polyscale
- TM Tamiya
The following lists categorize the paints
used by type, finish, make, manufacturers serial/stock number,
and color description: (Note: The TS Aluminum had lost its label
and the stock number is unknown) |
ENAMELS
|
GLOSS
|
FLAT
|
SILVERS
|
CLEAR
COAT
|
|
MM 1747
Black
|
MM 1749
Black
|
SNJ 1320
Spray Silver
|
MM 2736
Gloss Clear
|
|
TS 1145
White
|
MM 1768
White
|
MM 1790
Chrome Silver
|
|
|
TS 1111
Dark Blue
|
MM 1163
Gray
|
TS 1146
Silver
|
|
|
TS 1110
Blue
|
TS 1185
Rust
|
TS 1180
Steel
|
|
|
TS 1133
Brown
|
|
TS ? Aluminum
|
|
LACQUERS
|
NON-BUFFING
|
BUFFING
|
CLEAR
COAT
|
ALCLAD
II
|
|
NB Aluminum
|
BF Titanium
|
Testors
Metalizer Sealer
|
(B) Duraluminum
|
|
NB Steel
|
BF Magnesium
|
|
(E) Polished
Alum.
|
|
BF Burnt
Steel
|
|
|
(F) White
Alum.
|
|
BF Aluminum
Plate
|
|
|
(G) Chrome
|
ACRYLICS
CLEAR COAT
PS F404100
TM X-22
|
|
In addition to the listed paints,
the manufacturers recommended thinners were used. All paint
was applied with a Pasche H-3 type single action airbrush on
a D-500 compressor with regulator/water trap and extra in-line
water trap. 3-M brand blue masking tape and commercially purchased
PVA was used for masking. The ALCLAD II test card was made of
Evergreen brand 1/8th inch thick white styrene. The other five
test cards were obtained by cutting out the dividers from a
desktop letter holder made of a hard, dark smoke colored plastic,
the type of which is unknown. Apparently this non-styrene plastic
reacted adversely to some solvents and paint, as previously
mentioned for test card #3.
PROCEDURES
The five small test cards were prepared
first. Paints desired for testing were arranged and sorted by
type and color. The test cards were prepared by scribing lines
both vertically and horizontally to demarcate a matrix, either
4x4 (cards 1 through 3) or 3x4 (cards 4 and 5). On each card
a specified type of paint was applied along a horizontal row.
Once cured, various clear coat finishes and/or sealers were
applied along the vertical rows. To further expand the combinations
available, some vertical rows were allowed to overlap and place
various clear finishes on top of each other in a layered application.
To set a control for each test card, the far left column was
never top coated with anything and the bare, untreated "metalizer"
was allowed to remain. Since the SNJ system does not actually
use silver paint, rather a silver powder on top of a base coat,
the respective horizontal rows were base primed using different
gloss (card 1) and flat (card 2) colors before the SNJ powder
was rubbed into the surface of the partially cured paint. Silver
Rub-n-Buff was applied to the far right edge of several test
cards on top of fully cured clear coats, and in turn allowed
to cure. Where MM metalizer lacquers had sealer and clear coat
applied, the MM metalizer sealer was applied before the clear
coat, and allowed to cure. The reverse side of card 4 was used
to test PVA as a liquid mask agent. Some lines were scribed
and various patterns of mask were painted on the surface with
a fine tipped brush and allowed to dry, before a coat of NB
Aluminum was applied.
The ALCLAD II data card was prepared
in a separate operation after the first five data cards had
been completed. A strip of 1/16th inch thick Evergreen styrene
was marked to have 13 columns and five rows. The lower four
rows were of similar width, and the upper row left as a thin
strip to be unpainted by the ALCLAD II, leaving a visual indication
of the type of base primer used in each column. Before the base
primer columns were painted, various surface details were scribed
and etched into the surface. This was to allow later evaluation
of the ALCLAD II system's ability to accentuate (or attenuate)
scribed panels or rivets. When all the columns of base primer
were painted and cured, four rows of ALCLAD II were applied
along the length of the test card. After allowing approximately
one hour of cure time, masking tape was applied over the ALCLAD
II, firmly burnished down, and immediately peeled up to evaluate
the base primers ability to bond the ALCLAD II to the substrate
and/or base primers.
TEST CARD PREPARATION
Refer to attached pictures of each
data card and the matching data card map which details the specific
paint matrix applied.
|
DATA CARD 1: SNJ powder rubbed
into partially cured gloss enamel base, various clear coats.
From top to bottom, the four rows
of gloss base coats used were 1747 black, 1111 blue, 1133 brown,
and 1145 white. From left to right, the five columns of clear
coats used were none, metalizer sealer, MM 2736 clear, PS F404100
clear, TM X-22 clear.
|
|
|
|
|
DATA CARD 2: SNJ powder rubbed
into partially cured flat enamel base, various clear coats.
From top to bottom, the four rows
of flat base coats used were SNJ spray aluminum, MM 1749 flat
black, TS 1185 flat rust, MM 1762 flat white. From left to right,
the five columns of clear coats were applied in the same manner
as on data card 1. When fully cured, a thin band of silver Rub-n-Buff
was applied and buffed smooth along the far right edge of the
test card and allowed to cure.
|
|
|
|
|
DATA CARD 3: Silver enamels without SNJ powder, various clear
coats
From top to bottom, the four rows
of silver used were MM 1790 chrome silver, TS 1146 silver, TS
? aluminum, TS 1180 steel. From left to right, the five columns
of clear coats were the same as used on data card 1. When fully
cured, a thin band of silver Rub-n-Buff was applied and buffed
smooth along the far right edge of the test card and allowed
to cure.
|
|
|
|
|
DATA CARD 4: BF and NB metalizers
(light colors) with and without metalizer sealer, various clear
coats.
From top to bottom, the three rows
of metalizer lacquers were BF aluminum plate, NB steel, and
NB aluminum. Next, the right half of the first column and the
entire second column were sealed with metalizer sealer and allowed
to cure. Clear coats were applied as follows: left half of second
column - MM 2736 clear, right half of second column and left
half of third column - TM X-22 clear, right half of third column
- MM 2736 clear, fourth column - PS F404100 clear. The left
half of the first column was left untreated on all three rows.
When fully cured, a thin band of silver Rub-n-Buff was applied
and buffed smooth along the far right edge of the test card
and allowed to cure. Test card 4 was reversed and series of
overlapping lines and circles were scribed into the surface.
Liquid PVA was applied in specific patterns with a fine tipped
sable brush both within the scribed line boundaries and in free-hand
patterns. Once the PVA was dry, NB aluminum was sprayed over
the entire area, allowed to dry, and the PVA removed with sharp,
needle tip tweezers.
|
|
|
|
|
DATA CARD 5: BF metalizers
(dark colors) with and without metalizer sealer, various clear
coats.
From top to bottom, the three rows
of MM metalizer lacquers were BF burnt metal, BF magnesium,
BF titanium. From left to right the seven columns of metalizer
sealer and clear coats were applied in the same manner as on
test card 4.
|
|
|
|
|
ALCLAD II DATA CARD: Gloss,
flat and silver enamels, NB lacquer, and both enamel and acrylic
based clear coat base primers under four colors of ALCLAD II.
The test card was marked to have
13 equal width columns and equal width ALCLAD II rows, with
an allowance at the top so that a small sample of the underlying
base primer will remain visible. Scribing templates and pounce
wheels were used to apply some notional panels and rivet lines.
The columns of base primer were masked such that every other
column was painted, then allowed to cure. Once cured and safe
to mask over, the remaining areas in between were masked, painted,
and allowed to cure. From left to right the 13 columns of base
primer were as follows: TS 1145 white, TS 1110 blue, TS 1111
dark blue, TS 1133 brown, TS 11747 black, TS 1146 silver, MM
1762 flat white, MM 1163 flat gray, MM1749 flat black, NB aluminum,
MM 1790 chrome silver, MM 2736 clear top coat, and TM X-22 clear.
The base primers were set aside for several days to cure then
four rows of ALCLAD II were applied. From top to bottom the
four rows of ALCLAD II were (B) duraluminum, (F) white aluminum,
(E) polished aluminum, (G) chrome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATA CARDS
Photos of the data cards were taken
with a Cannon S30 4-meg digital camera set on AUTO, no flash.
Lighting was from an overhead two-bulb florescent shop light
with camera oriented to look-down upon the test cards which
were laying flat on white poster board. Shooting area was in
large 2-bay garage, 20 feet from the open door with bright diffuse
natural light coming in, as sky conditions at the time were
scattered clouds with bright sun, and distinct shadows visible.
Test cards were photographed on a color striped (thin pencil
lines and thick marker color lines) sheet to allow surface smoothness
and reflectance differences to be readily visible as well as
providing a visual color reference to assess "color" of the
metalizers.
ALL DATA CARDS
|
|
|
PVA MASK

|
RESULTS
SNJ powder rubbed into gloss enamel
produces a very shiny smooth surface but on flat enamel gives
a dull metal appearance. Different gloss bases have no readily
perceptible affect on the SNJ surface color but on flat paint
bases the SNJ seems to fill in pores and some of the base color
high spots show through giving a very slight color tone from
the base color to the dull SNJ surface. On gloss base SNJ, applying
metalizer sealer kills the brilliant shine and reduces the SNJ
finish to the equivalent of NB aluminum. Metalizer sealer on
flat based SNJ gives the surface a slightly darker, richer color
and a very slight sheen while stabilizing the surface and protecting
it from handling smudges, dirt, and discoloration. Enamel clear
over gloss based SNJ will not affect surface reflectance and
gives a shine more indicative of a "wet" dull metal surface
than a shiny, polished metal surface. Likewise, enamel clear
over flat base SNJ stabilizes the flat silver surface does not
affect reflectance and imparts a "wet" look. The PS F404100
clear performs similarly to the clear enamel on both types of
SNJ bases however on the gloss it leaves a very "wet" look while
on the flat based SNJ it leaves a semi-gloss, less "wet" look
with a very smooth surface. The TM X-22 clear performed very
much like the PS F404100 with a less "wet" look on the gloss
base and similar "wetness" look on the flat base. Additionally
it had a unique quality when viewed under a direct point-source
light (single bright bulb or direct sunlight). In these lighting
conditions the surface was smooth yet has a detectable level
of "sparkle" when shifting the piece around, as if the surface
is a rough, crystalline structure at a microscopic level.
Test card 3 had some unusual reactions
with the clear coats over the TS silver colors. The MM 1790
chrome silver held up well, but the other three (TS silver,
aluminum, and steel) colors became severely pitted in spots
when applied. Where metalizer sealer was applied over the three
TS paints that eventually pitted, the sealer appears to have
stabilized the underlying plastic or arrested the agent attacking
the plastic. The right half of the first column of card 3 had
the sealer peel away in a very thin layer when the masking tape
was removed. However, the remaining silver, aluminum, and steel
paints seem to have been positively affected by the sealer.
Despite loosing the sealer, the surfaces remained smooth and
stabilized against dirt and smudges, and do not show any signs
of the pitting which occurred in all the other columns on card
3 where the TS paints were applied. The reason for this is unclear
as the same solvents and thinners were used as on other samples.
One item that did seem to indicate a unique quality of the pitted
areas is that those specific TS enamels replicate metals and
are very "grainy" paints and do not spray well with the airbrush.
These may be formulated with a different carrier solvent base
and reacted to the type of plastic in an adverse way. This may
be unique to this type of plastic and not an issue with styrene.
The metalizer sealer (made to cover lacquer based BF and NB
lacquers) did not adhere well at all to any of these four types
of enamel silver paint. After lifting the masking tape virtually
all the metalizer sealer peeled away, yet had somehow reacted
with the surface to protect and stabilize it. The other clear
coats applied performed very similarly to the way they did on
test cards 1 and 2. The surface reflectance and brilliance was
unchanged and the samples were left with varying degrees of
a "wet" look. The clear enamel looks the wettest, the X-22 slightly
less wet looking than the enamel, and PS 404100 moderately wet
with a much smoother surface finish than the other two. The
Rub-n-Buff applied to the right edges of test cards 2,3,and
4 is a waxy paste that goes on somewhat heavy and must be rubbed
in well. It fills in pitted areas of flat paint well but tends
to get too thick on smooth areas. Rub-n-Buff stays soft and
waxy for a very long time and even when "hardened", is still
soft enough to scrape off with gentle fingernail pressure and
will flake off if picked with a sharp object. It apparently
out-gasses some of its solvents and leaves behind a silver colored
wax base whose metal replication properties are not good and
very dependent on having a very perfect base.
Metalizer lacquers perform well when
sprayed and appear to be compatible with almost any clear coat
applied, individually or in layers. The manufacturer recommended
Testors metalizer sealer tends to reduce the surface brilliance
of the paint, slightly lightens the BF aluminum plate, does
not affect the NB steel, and slightly darkens the NB aluminum.
In all cases the metalizer sealer bonded well and stabilized
the surface, while giving a protective barrier to dirt and smudges,
and imparted a slight sheen and minimal, if any, "wet" look.
The other enamel and acrylic clear coats performed unremarkably
and similarly to previous test cards. The highest shine and
thickest coat were from the MM 2736 clear giving a very "wet"
look. The TM X-22 was similar but less wet looking, and the
PS F404100 added some additional wetness and consistently had
the smoothest final surface finish. The PS F404100 performed
almost identically to the metalizer sealer except it imparted
a slightly "wet" look.
Applying the series of clear coats
on the BF metalizers with dark colors on test card 5 yielded
nearly identical results as those obtained on test card 4 with
light colored metalizers. The manufacturer recommended metalizer
sealer performed well and protects the paint from dirt, smudges,
and fingerprints without any appreciable change in color or
tone and a minimal addition of "wetness". All other combinations
of clear coats were compatible and no detrimental or unusual
characteristics were noted. Again, the PS F404100 seems to have
the best qualities for coverage and self-leveling to yield a
very smooth surface.
The ALCLAD II lacquers are very "hot"
as far as paints go, meaning that they have very volatile carriers,
which evaporated quickly allowing the paint to cure in a few
minutes. These "hot" paints can also attack bare plastic if
sprayed on wet and the volatiles remain on the surface too long.
While the different ALCLADS look similar, their chemical makeup
appears to be very different from one set of colors to the next.
All types tested proved very tenacious and bonded strongly to
any base primer tested. The white aluminum (F) and duraluminum
(B) had very stable color and surface brilliance characteristics
on all base primers and showed a marginal increase in shine
for gloss base compared to flat base primer. The polished aluminum
(E) and chrome (G) are totally dependent on their base primer
for their reflectance characteristics. When applied over gloss
enamels or gloss acrylics, (E) and (G) produce a very shiny,
mirror like surface that is tough and ready to mask in minutes.
However, if applied over flat base primer, (E) and (G) will
have little to no reflectance and masking tape will peel the
ALCLAD II totally off the surface. This appears to be the result
of the silver and flat paints being a more granular type of
material whereas the gloss paints set up to be a more homogeneous
layer of paint. Either the mid layers of the flat paint are
weak, or the solvents in the ALCLADII weaken them, and masking
tape pulls apart the base primer flat surface paint lifting
most with the ALCLAD II, leaving the primer behind with traces
of ALCLAD II on the surface. Since gloss paint is a more viscous
type of paint with better self-leveling, it seems to cure up
as a homogeneous layer to which the ALCLAD II fully bonds at
the surface interface. In a few spots the clear base primer
layers did not totally cover the styrene underneath and when
the ALCLAD II was sprayed on more heavily it promptly pitted
these locations as the volatiles in it quickly attacked the
plastic. For this reason it is imperative to apply the ALCLAD
II in light mist coats to allow the carriers to evaporate quickly
and not have time to attack the plastic. The first couple mist
layers will set up a barrier to help keep later mist layers
from attacking holes in the primer. This was verified in a few
locations where gaps between the gloss primer coats left bare
styrene. Carefully misting the ALCLAD II, and not attempting
to lay down a wet coat, a full coating was applied on the gloss-primed
columns in layers and the bare styrene gaps in between did not
pit. The scribed panels and rivets turned out reasonably well
and did not cause any problems with surface preparation or paint
application. While all ALCLAD II colors performed well on gloss
base, only the (B) and (F) were able to stay bonded to the flat
base primer when masking tape was removed. Apparently (B) and
(F) formulations of ALCLAD II are different, from (E) and (G),
and tend to "bite" deeper into the flat paint and do not just
lay on the surface, thus creating a stronger total layer of
paint able to withstand masking. The exception being NB aluminum
lacquer as a base primer which was not able to withstand any
masking for any color of ALCLAD II.
|
COMPATIBILITY
SNJ powder finishes adhere well and
stay bonded when rubbed into partially cured gloss or flat enamel
paint. All clear coats and metalizer sealer bond with the rubbed
SNJ surface well.
Rub-n-Buff adhered well to the surfaces
where it was applied. No particular preparations were required
before applying it and it does not seem to react adversely with
the underlying surface of TM or PS acrylic clear.
Metalizer sealer does not appear
to bond well to enamel base silver paint, yet other clear coat
enamels and acrylics bond well to the those paints without appreciably
changing the color or reflectance of the underlying paint. Metalizer
sealer is excellent at stabilizing the surface and protecting
from handling and masking damage for all types of paint tested.
Despite peeling away from the surface on enamels, the metalizer
sealer still left some degree of protection and stabilized the
surface. Various permutations of clear coat enamel and acrylic
layers applied over the BF and NB metalizers all seem to be
compatible.
The smoother and shinier the base
primer, the better the final results of the ALCLAD II that goes
over it. All ALCLAD II performed well when applied over gloss
enamel, clear enamel, or acrylic bases and did not show any
tendency to peel up when masked over. ALCLAD II (E) and (G)
do not resist masking well over a flat paint or chrome silver
enamel base coat, but (B) and (F) seem to cover well and bond
to those surfaces, and did not lift when masking tape was pulled
off. Non-Buffing lacquer type paints are not compatible with
ALCLAD II at all. The NB type paints seem to have a surface
layer of granular paint to which the ALCLAD II bonds. When masked,
the surface layer of the NB paint will separate from the base
layer and allow any type of ALCLAD II to lift away.
Using plain PVA as a liquid masking
agent on bare plastic works well with NB aluminum metalizer.
PVA as a masking agent worked well on bare plastic but its performance
on other surfaces was not evaluated. The PVA can be applied
accurately onto areas bounded by scribed panel lines or carefully
free handed in a desired area. PVA, a water based rubbery compound,
dries quickly and does not show any adverse reactions to the
paint or solvents used when over sprayed. Dried, painted PVA
peels up easily and leaves a clean, sharp edge. The masking
performance of PVA is not affected by the relative area covered
from very small 2-3 mm dots up to larger circular or rectangular
areas with very acute angles at the corners.
|
SUITABILITY
On gloss base the SNJ takes on a
brilliant shine while on flat base it remains dull and tends
to show a tone of the flat paint base primer color through.
Metalizer sealer applied over SNJ reduces the finish qualities
to that of BF aluminum plate and stabilizes the surface. Clear
coats applied over the SNJ do not appreciably change the surface
reflectance and tend to give the surface a "wet" look.
Clear enamels and acrylics applied
over certain enamel base paints will leave varying degrees of
"wetness" on the finish. Predominantly, enamel clear coat lays
on the thickest and gives a somewhat smooth, very "wet" looking
finish. TM X-22 clear acrylic is not as thick as enamel and
leaves an equally smooth, but less "wet" looking finish. PS
F404100 acrylic clear has the best self-leveling properties
of all tested clear coats and leaves the most smooth, least
"wet" finish.
BF and NB metalizer lacquers provide
excellent bonding and a smooth finish in their respective colors,
yet are not capable of providing a high reflectance surface.
On the darker BF metalizer colors the sealer has little effect
on the color or surface reflectance. On the lighter colors of
NB and BF metalizer the sealer tends to offset the color a bit
and slightly reduces the surface reflectance. The major variations
in final surface qualities seem to be dependent on the last
clear coat applied. The thickest and highest gloss (most "wet"
looking) finish was obtained from enamel, followed by TM X-22
with a less thick less "wet" look and in certain cases a somewhat
"sparkly" finish. The smoothest finish was obtained from PS
clear acrylic and it had the least level of "wetness" for a
clear coat.
There is a marginal, barely perceptible
change in the tone of color on ALCLAD II (E) and (G) when applied
over different gloss base primers, however the darker gloss
bases looked the best. For practical purposes, any gloss enamel
or acrylic base primer will provide adequate results and finish
quality for the ALCLAD II colors tested.
The surface qualities of Rub-n-Buff
were inferior to any of the paint or paint systems tested. The
thick, waxy paste will rub into the surface and adhere but tends
to fill in low spots on flat paint or a rough surface. This
allows much of the underlying surface to show and gives a distracting,
non-uniform appearance. While coverage is better and more consistent
on a glossy smooth surface, the thick waxy paste tends to have
a streaky look when buffed into the finish.
|
CHARACTERISTICS
SNJ finishes have a high reflectance
over gloss base, and a dull finish over flat base. The color
of the base for SNJ powder has a marginal effect for gloss base,
and a significant effect for flat bases. All SNJ finishes are
color and reflectance stable under clear coats and take on a
level of "wetness" dictated by the type of clear coat used and
the heaviness of the application. Applying clear coats or sealer
to these finishes protects them from handling damage.
SNJ spray aluminum and silver type
enamels provide smooth finishes and are color stable under all
clear coats and sealers. Type and heaviness of application of
the final clear coat control the level of finish "wetness".
Applying clear coats or sealer to these finishes protects them
from handling damage.
Various BF and NB metalizers provide
very consistent and uniform finishes. The surfaces are very
color and reflectance stable for metalizer sealer and clear
coats. Applying clear coats or sealer to these finishes protects
them from handling damage.Leaving BF and NB paints untreated
allows dirt and smudges to work into the surface from normal
handling while keeping the surface reflectance low, which may
be a desired look. Layering various clear coats on top of metalizer
sealer or on the paint directly will vary the "wetness" of the
surface without appreciable changes in color or reflectance.
The ALCLAD II paint system provides
a very tough, fast drying finish with variable degrees of color
and reflectance in a single top layer of paint. The final surface
finish characteristics are dependent on the quality of the underlying
base primer and the care used in applying the ALCLAD II. Surface
details scribed in prior to application of base primers show
detail and shape well. Simulated rivets from a pounce wheel
tend to look more like holes if not kept very small in size.
Scribed hatch and panel details show very vividly once final
layer of ALCLAD II is applied. Provided the ALCLAD II is bonded
well to a gloss base it can withstand very aggressive masking
with tape one hour after application.
The PVA is a viscous, water-based
liquid, which dries to form a thin, rubbery film. It is easy
to apply and applying the film thicker does not improve its
masking properties, but may enhance the ability to peel the
entire area of dried PVA off in one piece. However, if applying
PVA in by free hand with a brush, it may be difficult to accurately
trace a consistent edge as the liquid PVA is a pale light green
and very hard to see when being applied. The PVA has unique
properties in that it can be applied equally well in very small
areas, and/or in very intricate patterns.
|
FIDELITY OF NMF REPLICATION
With the main objective of applying
metalizer paints being the replication of a natural metal finish,
certain products, or combinations of products, perform better.
The final look being a subjective issue, a given product may
perform exactly as designed, yet not provide the desired emulation
of the surface. This occurs because some metalizers have rough,
porous type surfaces that require a sealer or clear coat to
stabilize and protect. This protective layer tends to degrade
the paints replication of the surface to varying degrees. Also,
applying clear coats (as in preparation for decaling) will impart
a "wet" look to the surface that may not be accurate or desirable.
Since the metalizers tend to be color and reflectance stable
with clear coats, it seems reasonable that a final layer of
compatible dullcoat over the glossy clear-coated surface will
adequately remedy an excessively glossy finish.
Natural metal exposed to the elements
takes on many different, subtle looks that can be replicated
by available metalizer paints. Once sealed or clear coated,
surface degradations such as dirt, wear, and stains becomes
more difficult. Performing desired weathering on the bare paint
might be a preferred method to achieve a weathered look before
coating to stabilize the surface from additional wear and tear.
SUMMARY
Metalizer finishes come in many types,
colors, and degrees of reflectance. The final results obtained
from a particular product or combination thereof are very dependent
upon the proper surface preparation and correct application
of the metalizer products in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.
Some departures from the recommended methods and materials may
be required for advanced modeling applications. When entering
the arena of mixing various media it is imperative that prior
testing for, or determination of, compatibility is performed.
While some mixed-media combinations and permutations of base
coat primers, metalizers, and sealers/clear coats are perfectly
compatible; the final resulting finish may not be suitable for
what the modeler desired. Metalizers are designed to provide
consistent, uniform finishes on a given surface application.
This may or may not be the desired intent of the modeler who
desires an inconsistent, weathered, or damaged looking surface,
which will require some level of advanced finishing techniques.
Using metalizers to accomplish this may be achievable if the
proper base paints are applied to the surface and careful layering
of additional metalizers is executed with a predetermined plan.
Likewise, the "poor" bonding qualities of some metalizers on
base primers may be exploited to emulate a surface that is flaking
away and deteriorating. The vast number of products on the market
dictate that the serious modeler research and test specific
materials in the desired application methods prior to committing
to a project in-work. The range of colors, finishes, reflectance,
and sheen available should provide any modeler with adequate
finishes to complete any model with suitable accuracy. Replication
of real world natural metal finishes is a fine tuned art which
demands a keen eye for detail and an inherent ability to choose
proper finishing materials. Because of the extensive number
of possibilities when choosing the best metalizers for a particular
project, it is impossible to lay out any type of meaningful
rule-of-thumb. The results achieved will be predicated on the
individual modeler's experience and familiarity with proper
use of the chosen material.
|
| © Mike
McLeod 2002 |
|